|
Sprinkler Systems
Uhaul move
Lawn care
Roses and trees
Ford Parts
Chrysler Parts
Lake Powell
New IPod Touch Apps
New IPhone Apps
IPhone Apps
IPad Information
IPad Apps
Android APPS
Android Games APPS
Android Systems
Android Tablets APPS and Beyond
Smartphone Apps
Smartphone Games Apps Repair and Tools
Tablet PC
Car Sharing Car Leasing
Tabler Pc
Fly Fishing
Toyota Cars
Vacation Rentals
Stock market
NYSE
SSE Stock
Freight & Shipping News
Gluten
Lactose
Gout
My Coupon Life
Campgrounds Check
Outdoor
Kitchen Design and Redoo
Bath Remodeling
Palm Springs
Las Vegas Vacation Tipps
Lake Powell Boating
Homes for lease
Electric and green Car Blog
Pearls and diamonds
Whatsapp and forget SMS Blog, What is Whatsapp App
Solar Panel Solar Energie Sun Power Blog
|
Fantasy » alt.fan.pratchett » Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes!
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257339] |
So, 16 April 2006 01:01 |
|
Stacie Hanes wrote:
> I need an organizational chart. Right now I think I've got two
> Trusted Lts., one Succubus Consort, and one Chief of Transportation
> and Finicky Points of Grammar.
http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c331/esmeraldus/orgchart.j pg
Apply now . . .
--
Stacie, 4th swordswoman of the afpocalypse.
AFPMinister of Flexible Weapons, Bondage-happy predator,
Speaker-To-Students, AFPMistress to peachy ashie passion &
AFPDeliciousSnack to 8'FED "If you can't be a good example, you'll
just have to be a horrible warning." C. Aird, _His Burial Too_
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257412 ] |
So, 16 April 2006 02:53 |
|
Stacie Hanes wrote:
> Stacie Hanes wrote:
>
>> I need an organizational chart. Right now I think I've got two
>> Trusted Lts., one Succubus Consort, and one Chief of Transportation
>> and Finicky Points of Grammar.
>
> Apply now . . .
Make that
http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c331/esmeraldus/orgchart.g if
--
Stacie, 4th swordswoman of the afpocalypse.
AFPMinister of Flexible Weapons, Bondage-happy predator,
Speaker-To-Students, AFPMistress to peachy ashie passion &
AFPDeliciousSnack to 8'FED "If you can't be a good example, you'll
just have to be a horrible warning." C. Aird, _His Burial Too_
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257456 ] |
So, 16 April 2006 04:30 |
|
Stacie Hanes <house_damodred [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
> Stacie Hanes wrote:
>> Stacie Hanes wrote:
>>
>>> I need an organizational chart. Right now I think I've got two
>>> Trusted Lts., one Succubus Consort, and one Chief of Transportation
>>> and Finicky Points of Grammar.
>>
>> Apply now . . .
>
> Make that
>
> http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c331/esmeraldus/orgchart.g if
Is the position as worthy adversary open?
Regards,
--
*Art
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257457 ] |
So, 16 April 2006 04:38 |
|
Arthur Hagen wrote:
> Stacie Hanes <house_damodred [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Stacie Hanes wrote:
>>> Stacie Hanes wrote:
>>>
>>>> I need an organizational chart. Right now I think I've got two
>>>> Trusted Lts., one Succubus Consort, and one Chief of
>>>> Transportation and Finicky Points of Grammar.
>>>
>>> Apply now . . .
>>
>> Make that
>>
>> http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c331/esmeraldus/orgchart.g if
>
> Is the position as worthy adversary open?
Oh, yes, certainly. Complicates the chart a little, though.
--
Stacie, 4th swordswoman of the afpocalypse.
AFPMinister of Flexible Weapons, Bondage-happy predator,
Speaker-To-Students, AFPMistress to peachy ashie passion &
AFPDeliciousSnack to 8'FED "If you can't be a good example, you'll
just have to be a horrible warning." C. Aird, _His Burial Too_
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257472 ] |
So, 16 April 2006 04:51 |
|
Stacie Hanes <house_damodred [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
> Arthur Hagen wrote:
>> Stacie Hanes <house_damodred [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Stacie Hanes wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Apply now . . .
>>>
>>> Make that
>>>
>>> http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c331/esmeraldus/orgchart.g if
>>
>> Is the position as worthy adversary open?
>
> Oh, yes, certainly. Complicates the chart a little, though.
I /excel/ at complicating things. Now I only need a sidekick.
--
*Art
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257473 ] |
So, 16 April 2006 05:02 |
|
Arthur Hagen wrote:
> Stacie Hanes <house_damodred [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Arthur Hagen wrote:
>>> Stacie Hanes <house_damodred [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> Stacie Hanes wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Apply now . . .
>>>>
>>>> Make that
>>>>
>>>> http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c331/esmeraldus/orgchart.g if
>>>
>>> Is the position as worthy adversary open?
>>
>> Oh, yes, certainly. Complicates the chart a little, though.
>
> I /excel/ at complicating things. Now I only need a sidekick.
You're an oval on the chart, but I'm not planning to upload new charts more
often than once or twice a day.
--
Stacie, 4th swordswoman of the afpocalypse.
AFPMinister of Flexible Weapons, Bondage-happy predator,
Speaker-To-Students, AFPMistress to peachy ashie passion &
AFPDeliciousSnack to 8'FED "If you can't be a good example, you'll
just have to be a horrible warning." C. Aird, _His Burial Too_
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257513 ] |
So, 16 April 2006 11:44 |
|
In article <oAg0g.3638$BS2.409 [at] newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
house_damodred [at] yahoo.com says...
> Stacie Hanes wrote:
> > Stacie Hanes wrote:
> >
> >> I need an organizational chart. Right now I think I've got two
> >> Trusted Lts., one Succubus Consort, and one Chief of Transportation
> >> and Finicky Points of Grammar.
> >
> > Apply now . . .
>
> Make that
>
> http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c331/esmeraldus/orgchart.g if
While ready to do my bit against spiders, what I really fancy is being
the underling who salutes and says "Your army awaits your orders,
Mistress Stacy. World Domination will be yours!" Chief of Staff?
Of course, before you reach that stage, you have some really important
questions to answer - such as the snazzy uniforms for the World
Dominating army. You could, of course, be predictable and go for mere
Sinister Black - but I would have thought you had a bit more stlye than
that. The Teal Horde? Then, of course, how sexy are the uniforms to be?
So much more tasteful for the opposition to be mown down by really
attractive henchpersons. Apart from the requisite few obviously moronic
prison guards, I think you need to establish minimum standards of
physical beauty for your minions. Then, of course, your Chief of Staff
could give his attention to ensuring that your standards are met.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257515 ] |
So, 16 April 2006 11:49 |
|
In article <MPG.1eac2258bd85dc51989bfb [at] news.individual.net>,
alec [at] spamspam.co.uk says...
> In article <oAg0g.3638$BS2.409 [at] newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> house_damodred [at] yahoo.com says...
> > Stacie Hanes wrote:
> > > Stacie Hanes wrote:
> > >
> > >> I need an organizational chart. Right now I think I've got two
> > >> Trusted Lts., one Succubus Consort, and one Chief of Transportation
> > >> and Finicky Points of Grammar.
> > >
> > > Apply now . . .
> >
> > Make that
> >
> > http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c331/esmeraldus/orgchart.g if
>
> While ready to do my bit against spiders, what I really fancy is being
> the underling who salutes and says "Your army awaits your orders,
> Mistress Stacy. World Domination will be yours!" Chief of Staff?
Whoops. At this point I realise thatr I have just become the late Chief
of Staff for mis-spelling your name.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257526 ] |
So, 16 April 2006 12:22 |
|
Alec Cawley wrote:
<snip>
> While ready to do my bit against spiders, what I really fancy is being
> the underling who salutes and says "Your army awaits your orders,
> Mistress Stacy. World Domination will be yours!" Chief of Staff?
>
> Of course, before you reach that stage, you have some really important
> questions to answer - such as the snazzy uniforms for the World
> Dominating army. You could, of course, be predictable and go for mere
> Sinister Black - but I would have thought you had a bit more stlye
> than that.
*More* stylish han black? I'm not sure I understand the concept.
> The Teal Horde?
Black with teal details, maybe. A subtle piping down the seams and
a hint of colour on the lapels.
> Then, of course, how sexy are the uniforms to be?
As it's Stacie's army, I think the answer is obvious - very!
> So much more tasteful for the opposition to be mown down by
> really attractive henchpersons. Apart from the requisite few
> obviously moronic prison guards, I think you need to establish
> minimum standards of physical beauty for your minions. Then, of
> course, your Chief of Staff could give his attention to ensuring that
> your standards are met.
That lets me out, then. Not that I ever much fancied being cannon
fodder anyway.
Diane L.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257614 ] |
So, 16 April 2006 20:09 |
|
Alec Cawley wrote:
> In article <oAg0g.3638$BS2.409 [at] newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> house_damodred [at] yahoo.com says...
>> Stacie Hanes wrote:
>>> Stacie Hanes wrote:
>>>
>>>> I need an organizational chart. Right now I think I've got two
>>>> Trusted Lts., one Succubus Consort, and one Chief of
>>>> Transportation and Finicky Points of Grammar.
>>>
>>> Apply now . . .
>>
>> Make that
>>
>> http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c331/esmeraldus/orgchart.g if
>
> While ready to do my bit against spiders, what I really fancy is
> being the underling who salutes and says "Your army awaits your
> orders, Mistress Stacy. World Domination will be yours!" Chief of
> Staff?
>
> Of course, before you reach that stage, you have some really
> important questions to answer - such as the snazzy uniforms for the
> World Dominating army. You could, of course, be predictable and go
> for mere Sinister Black -
They are, of course, green and black. This was covered at some point. Very
tailored and, of course, black is quite slimming.
I believe that means that the position of Chatelaine is now filled. Your
post comes with a green shoulder cord.
--
Stacie, 4th swordswoman of the afpocalypse.
AFPMinister of Flexible Weapons, Bondage-happy predator,
Speaker-To-Students, AFPMistress to peachy ashie passion &
AFPDeliciousSnack to 8'FED "If you can't be a good example, you'll
just have to be a horrible warning." C. Aird, _His Burial Too_
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257615 ] |
So, 16 April 2006 20:12 |
|
Alec Cawley wrote:
>> While ready to do my bit against spiders, what I really fancy is
>> being the underling who salutes and says "Your army awaits your
>> orders, Mistress Stacy. World Domination will be yours!" Chief of
>> Staff?
>
> Whoops. At this point I realise thatr I have just become the late
> Chief of Staff for mis-spelling your name.
Don't think I didn't notice, either, bub. There was going to be a
probationary period in the dungeon.
--
Stacie, 4th swordswoman of the afpocalypse.
AFPMinister of Flexible Weapons, Bondage-happy predator,
Speaker-To-Students, AFPMistress to peachy ashie passion &
AFPDeliciousSnack to 8'FED "If you can't be a good example, you'll
just have to be a horrible warning." C. Aird, _His Burial Too_
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257617 ] |
So, 16 April 2006 20:14 |
|
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 18:09:20 GMT, Stacie Hanes wrote in
<kLv0g.2941$An2.2744 [at] newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>, seen in
alt.fan.pratchett:
[...]
> >> Stacie Hanes wrote:
> >>> Stacie Hanes wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I need an organizational chart. Right now I think I've got two
> >>>> Trusted Lts., one Succubus Consort, and one Chief of
> >>>> Transportation and Finicky Points of Grammar.
> >>>
> >>> Apply now . . .
> >> Make that
> >> http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c331/esmeraldus/orgchart.g if
[...]
> I believe that means that the position of Chatelaine is now filled.
Could apply for the post of "Person with no specifically defined rôle
who gets in everyone's way and otherwise irritates or bores them"?
It'd fit nicely in with the rest of my life...
--
Ross, in Lincoln, most likely being cynical or sarcastic, as ever.
Reply-to will bounce. Replace the junk-trap with my name to e-mail me.
Demonstration of poor photography: <http://www.rosspix.me.uk> - updated with Czech photos
AD: <http://www.merciacharters.co.uk> for European charters occasionally gripped by me
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257618 ] |
So, 16 April 2006 20:15 |
|
Diane L wrote:
> Alec Cawley wrote:
>
> <snip>
>> Sinister Black - but I would have thought you had
>> a bit more stlye than that.
>
> *More* stylish han black? I'm not sure I understand the concept.
>
> Black with teal details, maybe. A subtle piping down the seams and
> a hint of colour on the lapels.
>
>> Then, of course, how sexy are the uniforms to be?
>
> As it's Stacie's army, I think the answer is obvious - very!
What she said . . .
> That lets me out, then. Not that I ever much fancied being cannon
> fodder anyway.
Well, Coeli does need an assistant . . .
--
Stacie, 4th swordswoman of the afpocalypse.
AFPMinister of Flexible Weapons, Bondage-happy predator,
Speaker-To-Students, AFPMistress to peachy ashie passion &
AFPDeliciousSnack to 8'FED "If you can't be a good example, you'll
just have to be a horrible warning." C. Aird, _His Burial Too_
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257623 ] |
So, 16 April 2006 20:32 |
|
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 18:12:46 GMT, Stacie Hanes
<house_damodred [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
>Alec Cawley wrote:
>
>> Whoops. At this point I realise thatr I have just become the late
>> Chief of Staff for mis-spelling your name.
>
>Don't think I didn't notice, either, bub. There was going to be a
>probationary period in the dungeon.
He gets your name wrong, and you reward him?
--
Andy Brown
Around computers it is difficult to find the correct unit of time to
measure progress. Some cathedrals took a century to complete. Can you
imagine the grandeur and scope of a program that would take as long?
-- Epigrams in Programming, ACM SIGPLAN Sept. 1982
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257636 ] |
So, 16 April 2006 21:26 |
|
Stacie Hanes wrote:
> Diane L wrote:
>> That lets me out, then. Not that I ever much fancied being cannon
>> fodder anyway.
>
> Well, Coeli does need an assistant . . .
Assistant Chief of Operations, eh? So who would I get to operate on?
Diane L.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257648 ] |
So, 16 April 2006 21:30 |
|
Ross wrote:
>
> Could apply for the post of "Person with no specifically defined rôle
> who gets in everyone's way and otherwise irritates or bores them"?
>
> It'd fit nicely in with the rest of my life...
Precocious eight-year-old saviour?
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257668 ] |
So, 16 April 2006 21:57 |
|
Alec Cawley <alec [at] spamspam.co.uk> wrote:
> In article <oAg0g.3638$BS2.409 [at] newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> house_damodred [at] yahoo.com says...
> > Stacie Hanes wrote:
> > > Stacie Hanes wrote:
> > >
> > >> I need an organizational chart. Right now I think I've got two
> > >> Trusted Lts., one Succubus Consort, and one Chief of Transportation
> > >> and Finicky Points of Grammar.
> > >
> > > Apply now . . .
> >
> > Make that
> >
> > http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c331/esmeraldus/orgchart.g if
*cough* What makes you think that I'll be subordinate to you? I may
skritch your ears, but that will be purely on a voluntary, case-by-case
basis.
> While ready to do my bit against spiders, what I really fancy is being
> the underling who salutes and says "Your army awaits your orders,
> Mistress Stacy. World Domination will be yours!" Chief of Staff?
>
> Of course, before you reach that stage, you have some really important
> questions to answer - such as the snazzy uniforms for the World
> Dominating army. You could, of course, be predictable and go for mere
> Sinister Black - but I would have thought you had a bit more stlye than
> that. The Teal Horde?
Teal? More style than black? Yuck. Teal is about as stylish as a
curduroy dress.
> Apart from the requisite few obviously moronic
> prison guards, I think you need to establish minimum standards of
> physical beauty for your minions.
Well, that's me out from the start, then.
Richard
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257679 ] |
So, 16 April 2006 22:12 |
|
On 2006-04-16 14:30:29 -0500, Torak <perry_awm [at] hotmail.com> said:
> Ross wrote:
>>
>> Could apply for the post of "Person with no specifically defined rôle
>> who gets in everyone's way and otherwise irritates or bores them"?
>>
>> It'd fit nicely in with the rest of my life...
>
> Precocious eight-year-old saviour?
Eight year olds, Dude!
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257684 ] |
So, 16 April 2006 22:23 |
|
In article <kLv0g.2941$An2.2744 [at] newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
"Stacie Hanes" <house_damodred [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
>Alec Cawley wrote:
>> In article <oAg0g.3638$BS2.409 [at] newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
>> Of course, before you reach that stage, you have some really
>> important questions to answer - such as the snazzy uniforms for the
>> World Dominating army. You could, of course, be predictable and go
>> for mere Sinister Black -
>
>They are, of course, green and black. This was covered at some point. Very
>tailored and, of course, black is quite slimming.
Much as I'd like to apply for the post of World Dominatrix's cat, I'd like
to make sure first that tailored snazzy uniforms are available in my shape,
complete with diamond-studded collar.
Cat.
--
Jazz-Loving Soul Mate and Tolerable Frog to CCA
Right idea Mr. Bond, but wrong pussy.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257690 ] |
So, 16 April 2006 22:41 |
|
René wrote:
> On 2006-04-16 14:30:29 -0500, Torak <perry_awm [at] hotmail.com> said:
>
>> Ross wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Could apply for the post of "Person with no specifically defined rôle
>>> who gets in everyone's way and otherwise irritates or bores them"?
>>>
>>> It'd fit nicely in with the rest of my life...
>>
>>
>> Precocious eight-year-old saviour?
>
>
> Eight year olds, Dude!
We can call him Wesley.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257695 ] |
So, 16 April 2006 23:05 |
|
In article <yOv0g.2943$An2.665 [at] newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
house_damodred [at] yahoo.com says...
> Alec Cawley wrote:
>
> >> While ready to do my bit against spiders, what I really fancy is
> >> being the underling who salutes and says "Your army awaits your
> >> orders, Mistress Stacy. World Domination will be yours!" Chief of
> >> Staff?
> >
> > Whoops. At this point I realise thatr I have just become the late
> > Chief of Staff for mis-spelling your name.
>
> Don't think I didn't notice, either, bub. There was going to be a
> probationary period in the dungeon.
My fate is obviously decided. About one minute after we are introduced
to the would-be Evil Dicatator, s/he has to show total ruthlessness by
gunning down an incompetent though loyal subordinate. Since incompetence
is my field of excellence, my role (short though it is) is determined.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257699 ] |
So, 16 April 2006 23:37 |
|
jester wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 18:12:46 GMT, Stacie Hanes
> <house_damodred [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Alec Cawley wrote:
>>
>>> Whoops. At this point I realise thatr I have just become the late
>>> Chief of Staff for mis-spelling your name.
>>
>> Don't think I didn't notice, either, bub. There was going to be a
>> probationary period in the dungeon.
>
> He gets your name wrong, and you reward him?
You're supposing that his duties will be pleasant.
--
Stacie, 4th swordswoman of the afpocalypse.
AFPMinister of Flexible Weapons, Bondage-happy predator,
Speaker-To-Students, AFPMistress to peachy ashie passion &
AFPDeliciousSnack to 8'FED "If you can't be a good example, you'll
just have to be a horrible warning." C. Aird, _His Burial Too_
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257700 ] |
So, 16 April 2006 23:37 |
|
Diane L wrote:
> Stacie Hanes wrote:
>> Diane L wrote:
>
>>> That lets me out, then. Not that I ever much fancied being cannon
>>> fodder anyway.
>>
>> Well, Coeli does need an assistant . . .
>
> Assistant Chief of Operations, eh? So who would I get to operate on?
Whomever you like?
--
Stacie, 4th swordswoman of the afpocalypse.
AFPMinister of Flexible Weapons, Bondage-happy predator,
Speaker-To-Students, AFPMistress to peachy ashie passion &
AFPDeliciousSnack to 8'FED "If you can't be a good example, you'll
just have to be a horrible warning." C. Aird, _His Burial Too_
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257701 ] |
So, 16 April 2006 23:39 |
|
The Stainless Steel Cat wrote:
> Much as I'd like to apply for the post of World Dominatrix's cat,
> I'd like to make sure first that tailored snazzy uniforms are
> available in my shape, complete with diamond-studded collar.
Of course, in anodized finish or powder coated.
--
Stacie, 4th swordswoman of the afpocalypse.
AFPMinister of Flexible Weapons, Bondage-happy predator,
Speaker-To-Students, AFPMistress to peachy ashie passion &
AFPDeliciousSnack to 8'FED "If you can't be a good example, you'll
just have to be a horrible warning." C. Aird, _His Burial Too_
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257702 ] |
So, 16 April 2006 23:40 |
|
Richard Bos wrote:
> Alec Cawley <alec [at] spamspam.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> In article <oAg0g.3638$BS2.409 [at] newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
>> house_damodred [at] yahoo.com says...
>>> Stacie Hanes wrote:
>>>> Stacie Hanes wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I need an organizational chart. Right now I think I've got two
>>>>> Trusted Lts., one Succubus Consort, and one Chief of
>>>>> Transportation and Finicky Points of Grammar.
>>>>
>>>> Apply now . . .
>>>
>>> Make that
>>>
>>> http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c331/esmeraldus/orgchart.g if
>
> *cough* What makes you think that I'll be subordinate to you? I may
> skritch your ears, but that will be purely on a voluntary,
> case-by-case basis.
>
Well, by definition.
> Teal? More style than black? Yuck. Teal is about as stylish as a
> curduroy dress.
Teal is my favorite color!
--
Stacie, 4th swordswoman of the afpocalypse.
AFPMinister of Flexible Weapons, Bondage-happy predator,
Speaker-To-Students, AFPMistress to peachy ashie passion &
AFPDeliciousSnack to 8'FED "If you can't be a good example, you'll
just have to be a horrible warning." C. Aird, _His Burial Too_
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257704 ] |
So, 16 April 2006 23:49 |
|
Stacie Hanes wrote:
> Diane L wrote:
>> Stacie Hanes wrote:
>>> Diane L wrote:
>>
>>>> That lets me out, then. Not that I ever much fancied being cannon
>>>> fodder anyway.
>>>
>>> Well, Coeli does need an assistant . . .
>>
>> Assistant Chief of Operations, eh? So who would I get to operate on?
>
>
> Whomever you like?
OK, I'm in. :-)
Diane L.
Assistant Chief of Operations in Stacie's Army of Dark(but stylish)ness
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257710 ] |
Mo, 17 April 2006 00:11 |
|
Stacie Hanes wrote:
> jester wrote:
>>On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 18:12:46 GMT, Stacie Hanes
>>>Alec Cawley wrote:
>>>
>>>>Whoops. At this point I realise thatr I have just become the late
>>>>Chief of Staff for mis-spelling your name.
>>>
>>>Don't think I didn't notice, either, bub. There was going to be a
>>>probationary period in the dungeon.
>>
>>He gets your name wrong, and you reward him?
>
> You're supposing that his duties will be pleasant.
Presumably Stacie has a Good Dungeon and a Bad Dungeon.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257720 ] |
Mo, 17 April 2006 00:58 |
|
Torak wrote:
>
> Presumably Stacie has a Good Dungeon and a Bad Dungeon.
Doesn't everyone?
--
Stacie, 4th swordswoman of the afpocalypse.
AFPMinister of Flexible Weapons, Bondage-happy predator,
Speaker-To-Students, AFPMistress to peachy ashie passion &
AFPDeliciousSnack to 8'FED "If you can't be a good example, you'll
just have to be a horrible warning." C. Aird, _His Burial Too_
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257724 ] |
Mo, 17 April 2006 01:12 |
|
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 21:40:46 GMT, Stacie Hanes wrote in
<yRy0g.3000$An2.1561 [at] newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>, seen in
alt.fan.pratchett:
> Richard Bos wrote:
[...]
> > Teal? More style than black? Yuck. Teal is about as stylish as a
> > curduroy dress.
>
> Teal is my favorite color!
I'll send you a Midland Mainline train in their old livery. Teal and
Orange.
You might rethink your favourite colours. ;-)
--
Ross, in Lincoln, most likely being cynical or sarcastic, as ever.
Reply-to will bounce. Replace the junk-trap with my name to e-mail me.
Demonstration of poor photography: <http://www.rosspix.me.uk> - updated with Czech photos
AD: <http://www.merciacharters.co.uk> for European charters occasionally gripped by me
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257729 ] |
Mo, 17 April 2006 01:38 |
|
Stacie Hanes wrote:
> Torak wrote:
>
>>
>> Presumably Stacie has a Good Dungeon and a Bad Dungeon.
>
> Doesn't everyone?
No, the common thing is to have His and Her Dungeon. Since you're
single, I expect people assumed you only had a Bad Dungeon.
(His Dungeon is more commonly known as The Shed, though.)
Orjan
--
The Tale of Westala and Villtin
http://tale.cunobaros.com/
Fiction, Thoughts and Software
http://www.cunobaros.com/
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257730 ] |
Mo, 17 April 2006 01:55 |
|
Orjan Westin wrote:
> Stacie Hanes wrote:
>
>>Torak wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Presumably Stacie has a Good Dungeon and a Bad Dungeon.
>>
>>Doesn't everyone?
>
>
> No, the common thing is to have His and Her Dungeon. Since you're
> single, I expect people assumed you only had a Bad Dungeon.
>
> (His Dungeon is more commonly known as The Shed, though.)
Two mildly humourous remarks of similar style came to mind while reading
this. In the spirit of the old Steve Jackson Choose Your Own Adventure
books, select the remark you find most amusing.
Or, in these more enlightened times, known as the computer room. *Go to
page 384.*
Or, in these more enlightened times, known as the kitchen. No girl's
getting near *my* woks[1]! *Go to page 23.*
[1] - Although some might argue that's what I've been doing wrong.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257745 ] |
Mo, 17 April 2006 02:52 |
|
Stacie Hanes <house_damodred [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
> Richard Bos wrote:
>
>> Teal? More style than black? Yuck. Teal is about as stylish as a
>> curduroy dress.
>
> Teal is my favorite color!
It does contrast with blood quite nicely, but I'm a traditionalist. Black
and burgundy for me. If I acquire underlings, they'll have to wear
skin-tight silver, of course.
Regards,
--
*Art
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257777 ] |
Mo, 17 April 2006 10:02 |
|
In article <jpj542lsr673t7pmtid2bcagqbfvhml8hc [at] 4ax.com>,
Ross <junk.trap [at] ross-mail.me.uk> wrote:
>On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 21:40:46 GMT, Stacie Hanes wrote in
><yRy0g.3000$An2.1561 [at] newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>, seen in
>alt.fan.pratchett:
>> Richard Bos wrote:
>[...]
>> > Teal? More style than black? Yuck. Teal is about as stylish as a
>> > curduroy dress.
>>
>> Teal is my favorite color!
>
>I'll send you a Midland Mainline train in their old livery. Teal and
>Orange.
Oo, excellent! Every good baddie has to have their own monorail system.
OK, I know Midland Mainline trains aren't designed to run on one rail, but
if Balfour Beatty or Jarvis are maintaining the track...
Cat.
--
Jazz-Loving Soul Mate and Tolerable Frog to CCA
That sounds like science fiction.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257815 ] |
Mo, 17 April 2006 12:34 |
|
Torak <perry_awm [at] hotmail.com> writes:
> René wrote:
> > On 2006-04-16 14:30:29 -0500, Torak <perry_awm [at] hotmail.com> said:
> >
> >> Ross wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Could apply for the post of "Person with no specifically defined rôle
> >>> who gets in everyone's way and otherwise irritates or bores them"?
> >>>
> >>> It'd fit nicely in with the rest of my life...
> >>
> >>
> >> Precocious eight-year-old saviour?
> > Eight year olds, Dude!
>
> We can call him Wesley.
What are you going to do with all those 8 year olds you've saved up?
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
Kent, CT11 9PW
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257828 ] |
Mo, 17 April 2006 12:51 |
|
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Torak <perry_awm [at] hotmail.com> writes:
>>René wrote:
>>>On 2006-04-16 14:30:29 -0500, Torak <perry_awm [at] hotmail.com> said:
>>>>Ross wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Could apply for the post of "Person with no specifically defined rôle
>>>>>who gets in everyone's way and otherwise irritates or bores them"?
>>>>>
>>>>>It'd fit nicely in with the rest of my life...
>>>>
>>>>Precocious eight-year-old saviour?
>>>
>>>Eight year olds, Dude!
>>
>>We can call him Wesley.
>
> What are you going to do with all those 8 year olds you've saved up?
They can help save the universe when we need lots of biomass to fling
into a supernova.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257837 ] |
Mo, 17 April 2006 13:11 |
|
Stacie Hanes wrote:
> Richard Bos wrote:
> > Teal? More style than black? Yuck. Teal is about as stylish as a
> > curduroy dress.
> Teal is my favorite color!
And corduroy can look good on the right person.
If I had an army, the dress code would be more on come-as-you-are basis
:-)
CCA
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257855 ] |
Mo, 17 April 2006 14:19 |
|
On 2006-04-17 06:11:01 -0500, "CCA" <sphira9343 [at] aol.com> said:
> If I had an army, the dress code would be more on come-as-you-are basis
Hmm. I thought the point of uniforms was that they are, well, uniform.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257860 ] |
Mo, 17 April 2006 14:26 |
|
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 09:02:46 +0100, The Stainless Steel Cat wrote in
<C0690A36966812606AB [at] 192.168.0.2>, seen in alt.fan.pratchett:
> In article <jpj542lsr673t7pmtid2bcagqbfvhml8hc [at] 4ax.com>,
> Ross <junk.trap [at] ross-mail.me.uk> wrote:
> >On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 21:40:46 GMT, Stacie Hanes wrote in
> ><yRy0g.3000$An2.1561 [at] newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>, seen in
> >alt.fan.pratchett:
> >> Richard Bos wrote:
> >[...]
> >> > Teal? More style than black? Yuck. Teal is about as stylish as a
> >> > curduroy dress.
> >>
> >> Teal is my favorite color!
> >
> >I'll send you a Midland Mainline train in their old livery. Teal and
> >Orange.
>
> Oo, excellent! Every good baddie has to have their own monorail system.
>
> OK, I know Midland Mainline trains aren't designed to run on one rail, but
> if Balfour Beatty or Jarvis are maintaining the track...
....they'll be on the floor.
Monorails. Hmm. Have you asked Merry Hell, sorry, Hill Shopping Centre
if they've still got theirs available? Must be going cheep if they
have, it hasn't been used in, ooh, a dozen years.
--
Ross, in Lincoln, most likely being cynical or sarcastic, as ever.
Reply-to will bounce. Replace the junk-trap with my name to e-mail me.
Demonstration of poor photography: <http://www.rosspix.me.uk> - updated with Czech photos
AD: <http://www.merciacharters.co.uk> for European charters occasionally gripped by me
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257880 ] |
Mo, 17 April 2006 14:11 |
|
Matthew Seaman m.seaman [at] infracaninophile.co.uk wrote in
<86acak7anv.fsf [at] happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>:
> Torak <perry_awm [at] hotmail.com> writes:
>
> > René wrote:
> > > On 2006-04-16 14:30:29 -0500, Torak <perry_awm [at] hotmail.com> said:
> > >
> > >> Ross wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> Could apply for the post of "Person with no specifically defined rôle
> > >>> who gets in everyone's way and otherwise irritates or bores them"?
> > >>>
> > >>> It'd fit nicely in with the rest of my life...
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Precocious eight-year-old saviour?
> > > Eight year olds, Dude!
> >
> > We can call him Wesley.
>
> What are you going to do with all those 8 year olds you've saved up?
>
What with the current prices for oil and gas it does no harm to have
plenty of fuel for a real fire.
--
eric
www.ericjarvis.co.uk
"live fast, die only if strictly necessary"
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Hope for spiderphobes! [message #257892 ] |
Mo, 17 April 2006 15:44 |
|
CCA <sphira9343 [at] aol.com> wrote:
>
> If I had an army, the dress code would be more on come-as-you-are
> basis :-)
Like many current guerrilla fighters, you mean? Giving the enemy an excuse
to kill civilians, because it's difficult to distinguish them from the armed
forces? Bright idea, that.
Regards,
--
*Art
|
|
|
Gehe zu:
aktuelle Zeit: Sa Mai 26 05:04:33 CEST 2012
Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0,09444 Sekunden |
